| ||
|
> Back THE MAHAWELI - The Blurring of a Visionby Hans-Peter Müller and Siripala T. Hettige (eds.) Ratmalana (Sri Lanka):
Sarvodaya PREFACE Mahaweli is the longest river in Sri Lanka, running in a curve around the central Kandy-mountains down to the north-eastern shore of the island (see map 1). After many years of study involving many agencies, a Master Plan was formulated in 1968, presenting a long-term programme with the objective of harnessing the economic potential of the river. The purpose of the project was to produce hydro-power and divert a large proportion of the water into the northern dry zone for irrigation, in addition to new schemes on the right bank and augmenting the existing irrigation facilities to the settlements on both sides of the river. Linked to the so-called "down-stream development" is a large resettlement pr0grgramme intended to bring a pioneer population in the so-far thinly populated areas thereby reducing the population pressure in the wet zones This project is one of the largest of its kind in the world, at the same time it is situated in a relatively small country, and it had been realized in the shortest possible time with a massive mobilization of external funds and expertise. The expectations were accordingly high, and the impact on the state budget heavy. After completion of the construction work, and the reorientation of state priorities towards other "frontiers", it is possible to engage in a general evaluation and analysis. With thin intention in mind, an interdisciplinary group was invited to a one-week seminar on the Monte Verità in Ascona, Switzerland to discuss issues considered relevant and to suggest further actions. The composition of the group should merge insider knowledge, expertise, multidisciplinarity - and most of all, objectivity and a high degree of empathy. The core group consisted of 8 specialists from Sri Lanka, 2 Sri Lankans living in Europe, and 7 members from Europe and USA, including one living in Sri Lanka. Out of these 17 persons, 3 were female. A few additional invitees represented development assistence agencies, the private sector and the universities. Nobody from the present Mahaweli Development Board was invited. However, a participant has been mandated to inform the directorate, immediately after the meeting, of the outcome of the deliberations. The meeting was made possible by a generous grant offered by the Fondazione Stefano Franscini, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich (Switzerland).
INTRODUCTION (p. 1-22) 1) MAHAWELI AS A FIELD OF TENSION Irrigation Settlements in the Dry Zone of Sri Lanka: Historical Background The Dry Zone of Sri Lanka, where the country's early human settlements and civilization were based, was the seat of a multitude of simple as well as highly sophisticated, elaborate irrigation works. Once the Dry Zone civilization collapsed due to diverse circumstances (Indrapala, 1971, Murphy, 1957) around the 12th century a.d. and population centres shifted to areas which are today known as the Wet Zone, only a few inhabitants seem to have existed in the abandoned region supported by small village tanks untill recent times. It is only in the late 19th century that deliberate attempts were made to restore some of the irrigation infrastructure with a view to supporting village settlements. Even though the British colonial administration took steps to open up the area by extending roads and other basic services to the north-central Dry Zone around the turn of the century, concerted efforts at the restoration of major irrigation tanks and the reclaiming of long abandoned tracks of rice fields with the objective of returning to the `roots` and establishing dense peasant settlements were not undertaken until a considerable measure of self-rule was conceded by the British colonial power to the indigenous political elite in the early 1930's. The historical period that commenced with the establishment of large peasant settlements under the newly restored large irrigation tanks up till recent years is, in fact a history of continous efforts to resettle people in various parts of the Dry Zone extending from Anuradhapura in the North Central Province to Hambantota in the South. The most recent Mahaweli Development Project, on the one hand represents a continuation of the above trend, and on the other, marks a historically significant departure at least in one respect. Unlike earlier schemes, it permanantly links together a large part of the country through its extensive network of upstream reservoirs and downstream conveyence and distributary canals. This modern irrigation system cuts accross boundaries of a number of regions in both the dry zone as well as the wet zone hill country where the major reservoirs are constructed. This is unprecedented in the history of Sri Lanka in the sense that Mahaweli System for the first time technically integrates a number of otherwise desparate ecological regions. The Mahaweli Development Project has constituted a field of tension since its inception in the mid 1960's, particularly after the decision for acceleration was taken in 1977. This decision has been the result of the confluence of several dominant interests, both internal and external. The dominant interests involved were such that they laregely determined the phasing of the process of implementation of the project itself. The history of the Mahaweli Project is a story of alignement and realignement of forces continually guiding the course of Mahaweli. As is well known, Mahaweli became the lead investment project of the UNP-Government newly elected in 1977. The liberal economic policies of the new regime no doubt encouraged the donor agencies which came forward to contribute investment capital towards the project. The sheer magnitude of the project in the context of a much reduced implementation period no doubt helped bring the hardware component of the project into the fore-ground thereby pushing aspects of human settlement planning into the background, at least in the initial stages. The result was that the down-stream human settlement development was not accorded the same level of importance as engineering works in terms of priority, expert involvement, resource allocation etc. The time lag and the unequal emphasis placed between the construction of headworks, on the one hand, and the provision of support services for settler development, on the other, has prevented the simultaneous achievement of all major objectives. For instance, power generation targets have long been met, while social development goals in the settlements in terms of increased standards of living, diversification of income sources, housing, etc. are still far from being attained.
Dependence and Vulnerability of Downstream Populations The construction of a number of upstream reservoirs and the opening up of a large downstream area for resettlement enabling the effective harnessing of the water resources of the Mahaweli river basin for electricity generation and irrigated agriculture has encapsulated a vast population, both upstream and downstream, within a complex ecological and technical system. The large population scattered in the downstream areas depends on the above system for their water requirements. While the peasant settlers in the upstream catchment areas of Mahaweli do not derive direct benefits from the Mahaweli system, the utilization by them of land and other natural resources in the region has a bearing on the sustainability of the Mahaweli system. For instance, deforestation and soil erosion resulting from increased exploitation of natural resources in these areas can have an adverse effect on the sustainability and the capacity of the technical system of Mahaweli. Such a development can hardly be in the interest of the downstream settlers and of the country as a whole. Given the current tendency in the country towards devolution of political power and decentralization of administration, a question arises as to whether there exist system-level mediation mechanisms that are capable of bringing about a reasonable balance between conflicting regional interests.
System Logic versus Household Strategies The nature of the technical structure and the size and the spacial distribution of the settler population dependent on it tend to pull the Mahaweli system in two divergent directions. The technical structure necessitates the preservation of the unity of the system in functional and ecological terms. It compells the authorities to formulate rational procedures for water allocaton and distribution on the system level. The multitude of water users scattered in the downstream settlements who are mostly small-holding peasants are more likely to be concerned with the availability of water to their fields rather than with the wider concerns of the Mahaweli system. The intens competetion for irrigation water, pervasive normlessness, refusal to share cost of maintenance, etc. all point to the disruptive effects of such individualistic persuits of personal as against collective interests.
Bureaucratic Control and Settler Participation Another dimension of tension within the Mahaweli system emanates from the continued bureaucratic control of the technical infrastructure. The high degree of vertical integration of the components within the system leaves limited room for local autonomy and control; and this has acted as an obstacle to the realization of the farmer's potential for self management. Experience with the organized local communities clearly indicates strong interest to achieve as much autonomy and control over lower structures as possible and to extent their area of influence upwards along the conveyance canal. This is evident in the fact that, in recent years organized farmer groups in certain areas like Anuradhapura have taken measures voluntarily to federate local farmer organizations. If such loosely federated farmer groups get co-opted by local politicians into their political constituencies, they are likely to have some influence over the actions of the higher authorities on the system-level, but no longer as independent farmer organizations. The contradiction between centralized technocratic authority and local control might be reinforced by the recent attempts to promote democratic farmer participation through a programme of farmer organizations. One of the major obstacles to the growth of local organizations has been the tendency on the part of the local level officials to control or dominate such organizations. Given the nature of the Mahaweli organizational structure, these officials are mainly accountable to their superiors. So, as agents of a centralized authority, they aspire to have control over local affairs, not least in order to justify their own existence as a class of officials.
Top-down versus Bottom-up Approach The top-down approach adopted by the Mahaweli authorities in the implementation of the project from its inception has inhibited bottom-up or grass-roots level initiatives. Though such an approach might have facilitated the efficient and effective implementation of the engineering programme, the same approach which has pervaded the process of implementation of the resettlement programme has no doubt been counterproductive in the latter context. The resettlement of a large mass of people over a vast area of land can hardly be compared neither with the construction of headworks nor the development of downstream irrigation infrastructure. The inadequate attention paid by the planners to this fact represents yet another instance where the technocratic bias led to many problems of resettlement, most of which are not new in the Sri Lankan context in view of its long experience with peasant colonization. A bottom-up approach to resettlement which would have taken into account the local conditions, initial problems the settlers face, the need to evovle social support systems, etc. could have avoided many of the problems that beset many settlers today. The high degree of social disorganization that already characterizes many settler communities could also have been checked if adequate attention was paid to the need for community mobilization at the outset of the settlement process. The presently evident self-seeking tendendy among many settlers does not necessarily indicate that they are incapable of engaging in collective endavours which benefit the entire local community. It should however be noted that the practice of bringing together housholds with diverse origins and backgrounds can have an adverse effect on the the self-help capacities of settler communities.
Equitable Distribution versus Class Differentiation An ideology of peasant proprietorship has pervaded the process of rural peasant settlement in Sri Lanka since the late 1930's . In this respect, Mahaweli settlement programme has not been an exception. The persistent preoccupation on the part of the politicians and planners with such an ideology has curiously been against the country's experience which pointed to a general tendency towards class differentiation. In spite of restraining legislation, illegal disposal, informal control and aquisition of land, dispossession, etc. have characterized the land tenure patterns in peasant settlements. As in the past, this development has been judged as negative, unfair and unjust in the present-day Mahaweli as well. So, the objective of equitable development as against the empirical reality of class differentiation resulting in the pauperization of a sizable segment of the settler population continues to provide a point of contention in the context of Mahaweli in the years to come. Empirical studies on class differntiation do not bring out conclusive evidence to show how and why differentiation occurs. The evidence is often so mixed and complex that the question as to whether the apparent inevitability of class differentiation should be taken for granted or whether steps should be taken to stem it continues to grapple the minds of all those concerned. These issues in turn have a bearing on another duality that characterizes the discourse on the settlement development process, namely, the issue of macro-economic integration and peasant subsistence production.
Growth versus Welfare Irrigation infrastructure development which constitutes a major part of the Mahaweli development project is in fact the largest and most probably the last such investment in irrigated agriculture in the country. Given the magnitude of the investment involved, can Mahaweli afford to simply reproduce the small, subsistence-level, family-based production units across the vast span of land which has come under its perview? Or should not this investment result in regional growth and development which prepares the groundwork for agricultural diversification and industrialization, both rural and urban? But then the question arises as to whether it is too late to hope for such an internal dynamic in view of the advanced state of the second generation problem and the already unfavourable man-land ratio resulting from it. There have also been other factors contributing to poverty such as persistent episodes of illness, indebtedness, inadequate access to water, etc. Empirical studies conducted by researchers in different Mahaweli settlements point to the impoverishment of a sizable segment of the settlers. While in some cases, impoverishment has been due to total dispossession of land, in others, it has been the result of land fragmentation. While the dispossessed usually rely on wage labour for their sustenence, those who retain at least a small part of their allottments tend to seek food security by cultivating paddy, mostly for their own consumption. Poor peasants who often do not produce a considerable marketable surplus possess no investment capital needed to cultivate other cash crops which are usually more profitable than paddy. This allows those with investment capital to lease in plots of land belonging to poor farmers to grow more profitable cash crops. Many new settlers who move into an inhospitable environment characterized by desease, inadequate basic social infrastructure, the absence of extra-familial support in the form of reciprocal kinship networks, etc. often find themselves trapped in poverty. It is they who continue to eke out a living either as subsistence producers or as wage labourers. In other words, it seems reasonable to assume that the provision of adequate initial support in the form of healthcare, shelter, credit, extension, and income support is a precondition for successful resettlement, at least in the case of more vulnerable groups. The provision of a land allottment and irrigation water alone can be grossly inadequate if they are not accompanied by such services. From a purely economic point of view, social infrastructure facilities mentioned above may appear to be unproductive welfare expenditure which may not bring any tangible returns. Yet, in the absence of them, if the settlement process results in the pauperization of a large segment of the settler population and breeds subsistence orientation among poor farmers, it is questionable whether initial investments in human resource development, in fact are unproductive investments. In other words, it may well be argued that such investments do in fact provide the initial impetus for surplus accumulation and consequent economic growth. If the argument advanced above is empirically plausible, then, inadequate investments in social infrastructure development in the downstream areas may well explain the insignificant agricultural diversification and the absence of rapid economic growth in the new settlements. While dispossession and poverty prevent a sizable proportion of the settlers from engaging in economically viable agricultural production, the emergence of other social problems such as alcoholism, intra-family conflicts and illhealth makes the breaking away from poverty still more difficult.
2) IRRIGATION AND SOCIETY - A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE "Mahaweli" is a project which can be approached from many angles, e.g. ecological, engineering, economic, political, etc. The perspective guiding the papers in this publication is broadly sociological. Since the engineering work has been quite successfully completed, the most relevant factor for resettlement, management and maintenance has shifted to the efficient handling of social relations and political constraints. Politics in this view is defined as the arena in which competing interests (economic or otherwise) are articulated by diverse groups. In this context, the economic outcome can be treated as a product of political and social forces which are active on household and institutional levels. Probably the most relevant area for analysis is the interface between government officials and settlers, mostly farmers. As far as agricultural production and the process of social integration of the heterogenous settler population are concerned, the future development of this relation may become the most relevant single factor influencing the success or the failure of the project. In Sri Lanka's large irrigation systems, control over land is primarily based on legal regulations and not on direct ownership, neither of farmers nor of officials. Whereas farmers work on land leased out by the state, officials dominate core functions of the production process mainly by exerting control over the management and distribution of irrigation water. In this respect, two questions arise: The first refers to the extent that state institutions are directly involved in managing resources of agricultural production (e.g. devolution), the second relates to the efficacy of such state activities (e.g. legitimacy). The sociological approach adopted in the present work seems the most appropriate for an analysis of the Mahaweli Project in general and the relation between officials and farmers in particular. It will be based on the analysis of four major aspects: (i) the complexity of the technical infrastructure, (ii) the productivity and functional differentiation of households and local communities, (iii) the relative autonomy of local organizations, and (iv) the qualitative aspects of social integration of various sections of the population. As mentioned above, the macro-economic viability is a product of dinamic interaction between these four aspects. Such an approach essentially transcends narrow economic models which are usually used for evaluating the rentability of a project. The main theme in this book revolves around the linkages between technology, centralized control and household economy. We assume that the role that a central authority, public or private, has to play in the management of production increases with the size and complexity of a technical system. However, this does not mean that the relationship involved is rigid or mechanical, but rather represents a general tendency. We, therefore suggest that a distinction is made between normative control and executive power. Normative control refers to the capability of the authorities to define and enforce rules guiding the activities of persons and organizations; executive power reflects the extent to which means of production and transport are directly owned and managed by an actor, public or private. So far, the Mahaweli Authority claims to control both, the norms and the factors of production, and this raises the question with regard to the optimal extent and the mix of such control. Generally speaking, it seems that the most efficient combination in complex systems like Mahaweli can be expected when the state combines low executive power with high normative control. According to our understanding, devolution does not mean the withdrawal of the state but, on the contrary, a situation where the state is in a position to defend public interests and take a firm stand against particularistic tendencies. In other words, the correlation between technological complexity and political authority is multifaceted: For large irrigation systems like Mahaweli, stability, transparency, and credibility of laws and regulations is highly functional, whereas direct involvement of the state in production related activities is not. There has been a long academic debate regarding the historical links between "hydraulic society" and "despotic state" (Wittfogel, 195xxx). The classical argument states that the high dependency of a society on irrigated agriculture based on the continuous management of a complex irrigation infrastructure gives monopolistic contol to a class of bureaucrats managing irrigation systems and agricultural production. It further states that the problem lies in the far-reaching dependency of large sections of the population on the services of an irrigation bureaucracy. This state bureaucracy tends to eventually develop a conservative tendency, promoting rigid social and ideological structures which, in the long run, retard dynamic development. It has often been pointed out that this bleak picture reflects historical conditions in China, Mesopotamia, Egypt and other societies dependent on large river irrigation, but did correspond to the historical situation of Sri Lanka. Behind this apparant exception lies the difference between the significance of irrigated agriculture as such and the type of irrigation technology involved. If "large scale" irrigation is based on a multitude of decentralized water sources like in Sri Lanka, there is no logical reason why centralized political authority should be envisaged. And in fact, though Sri Lanka heavily depended on irrigation during medieval times, she did not witness such type of political authority. Contrary to the argument put forward by some social historians (Leach 19XXX, Gunawardena 19XXX), the condition assotiated with "oriental despotism" is not the dependency on irrigated agriculture as such, but the size and complexity of irrigation structures: centralized control of large river-based irrigation systems versus decentralized tank irrigation. When this point is taken into account, the so called exeptionality of Sri Lanka, where small tank irrigation prevailed, clearly conforms to the classical theory. The Sri Lankan scene has, however changed with the appearance of the Mahaweli project. Since 1980, a centralized management structure deals with a complex river irrigation system covering nearly one third of the country's cultivated paddy area. Based on historical evidence alone, it would not be surprising if a movement towards a kind of "oriental despotism" develops once the state has taken over a direct productive role in the vital food sector. In concrete terms, we could expect a tendency towards: (i) a weakening of local and regional authority and increasing farmers' direct exposure to state institutions; (ii) growing density of state regulations in irrigated agriculture and other fields; (iii) more direct control of production process by state officials; (iv) and intensification of ideological representations of personalized state power. However, the relative significance of Mahaweli in the present context is not the same as it would have been in the medieval period. If the fact that Sri Lanka is already integrated within the modern world system, one may raise the question whether the emergence of a "despotic" system can still be expected. The reasons why such a developement is unlikely are the following. Firstly: state revenue does not depend any more, as in the past, on the appropriation of peasant surplus. In modern Sri Lanka, such exploitation takes place more in the context of the plantation sector, and, in recent years, also of the export oriented Free Trade Zones. Secondly: food has become a world commodity and can easily be imported. Guaranteeing food security to a large majority of the population has become a basis of the legitimacy of political regimes wordwide. Therefore, the food sector is more subsidized than taxed. Most important perhaps is the third argument: The construction work has been largely financed by Western countries. In the short run, they insist on economic profitability to ensure recovery of loans. In the long run, they expect the growth of sufficient democratic control so that bureaucratic inertia within a "despotic" political environment is unlikely to develop. We are not concerned here with the social costs of such a scenario but are referring to the limited applicability of historical experience due to changed macro-parameters. Unlike in the past, today powerful external interests militate against the development of an almighty centralized bureaucracy. Devolution therefore is expected to take place even against bureaucratic resistance. At this point we wish to return to the question relating to the relationship between the peasant producers and the state. If it is agreed that the state has to rely more on normative control than executive power, the question arises as to how to distinguish between those functions which could in part be executed locally or by autonomous organizations, and those which are at present unsatisfactorily carried out by the state but would require tighter control.
3) IMPERATIVES OF MAHAWELI So far in this introductory chapter, we have attempted to give an account of diverse and complex forces at work in the context of Mahaweli. Mahaweli is an arena in which different groups, i.e. settlers, officials, politiciants, etc. pursue their often divergent interest. However, it should become evident that the degree of freedom available for the different groups is determined by a number of systemic constraints. This means, whatever the options that are persued, their viability should necessariy be assessed in terms of the imperatives outlined below.
Dealing with Complexity Complexity results from the number and type of linkages in the structure of a system. As can be seen from map 3, Mahaweli is characterized by a high degree of complexity - a fact which will not change over time since it is built into the technical layout. However, complexity is not only determined by technical or rational considerations. The changing or persisting cropping patterns, population dynamics, changing demand and supply of energy, the nature and structure of national and local political constituencies, etc. are also factors which influence the decision-making process relating to allocation of water. In particular, three sources of complexity can be identified: a) The size of the system: The amount of water available from Mahaweli river and its tributaries permits the diversion of substantial quantities of water into different regions of the island, resulting in a cascade of large irrigation systems integrated in an overall system with many bifurcations. In addition, thanks to the large storage tanks, the timing and the duration of the water flow can be regulated to a large extent. With this techno-ecological complexity, the need for political legitimization increases: In the future, water scarcity or abundance in a certain area will no more be considered as "natural". From now on, there will always be an element of human decision involved in the availability of water. Also, the maximization of benefits from the water available will inevitably include both, economic and political considerations. b) The multifunctionality of the system: Like many similar schemes, Mahaweli technical structure has been so concieved as to facilitate the achievement of the twin-objectives of power generation and the expansion of irrigated agriculture. While the users of electricity and those using irrigation water for crop production do not necessarily share the same interests, the division of water resources between these two different uses is more than likely to persist into the future as a point of contention. Competition between these two sources of demand for water will operate in two different ways. First, as can be seen from map 3, about 80% of the hydropower installations are concentrated on the branch serving the north-eastern part of the country. The political decision to increase power production automatically increases the quantity of water available in the north-eastern down-stream areas and reduces the water available for the northern and northwestern systems. A second source of competition between electricity production and irrigation results from seasonal variations of water release. Hydropower generation responds mainly to the demand of urban and industrial consumers. The time when water is needed for electricity production does not necessarily coincides with the time when the downstream farmers need water for irrigation. Though all the water used for electricity production is subsequently available for irrigation, the time factor frequently results in conflicts which have to be solved within political institutions. c) The Speed of construction: Due to acceleration, many different activities had to be performed simultaneously. The opportunity to learn from mistakes was practically non-existent; if during the planning stage one assumption was wrong, the mistake is often replicated within the whole system. Stepwise learning could not devlop naturally. Instead, the process of construction had to be initiated on the basis of hypothetical assumptions with respect to the progress of work - assumptions which were utterly unrealistic, particularly in donwstream development. It is not the acceleration as such, but the need for simultaneous action that resulted in a degree of complexity which was far beyond what any centralized authority could handle. Mahaweli Authority's response to this challenge was strong centralization of management functions. However, when the construction phase is ower, for reasons discussed before, it has been proved that it is difficult to reverse the process though such new management style is imperative in order to create conditions favorable for longterm operation and maintenance. Otherwise the gains in terms of efficiency owing to centralization is likely to be neutralized by the loss of efficiency when the construction work is completed. Centralized control, however, continues to be indidspensible in at least three vital areas such as: the maintenance of the head works, the distribution of water to the various systems (but not within the systems), and the prevention of normative uncertainties and vageries.
Sustainability Sustainability basically aims at reproduction, not only of living systems, but also of technical and social systems. Mahaweli has become a vital factor in the food production sector of Sri Lanka; and the assets accrueing from the vast investment made in material, political and social terms will have to be retained for many centuries to come. First of all, this means a stable balance between cultural and natural systems; then it includes the attainment and stabilization of high productivity for national food security as well as the necessary income for maintenance and operation of the technical infrastructure; finally the stability of social institutions which alone will guarantee material and spiritual health of future generations, must be guarateed. For the time being, reproduction in any of the three areas delineated above is not assured at all:
It seems that Mahaweli resettlement project (as against power production scheme) can be expected to move in a positive direction only if the three conditions required for sustainability are carefully respected: Sustainable nature-culture relation, sustainable technical systems, and sustainable social structure. Whereas the first condition requires a strong state, able and willing to effectively defend the interests of the yet unborn generations, the second condition could perhaps best be realized by applying a "double standard" to the management of an irrigation system: normative rules at the macro-level, entrepreneurial style at the micro-level (cf. Merrey's contribution). Compared to the ecological and managerial conditions which can be arranged from the top, the promotion of the third condition indispensable for sustainability turns out to be more difficult: Social integration on local level cannot be ordered from above. To come closer to the desired end, what is needed are patience, reliability of rules and regulations, and confidence in the self-management capacities of the farmers. Since "farmers" are a rather heterogenious group in terms of class-, gender- and age differences, vulnerable groups have to be identified and thereafter taken care of, and strengthened. In a context like Mahaweli, it is expected that economic growth can only gather momentum after the conditions for sustainable development have been generated. One of the basic criteria for such change is the equitable access to means of production and public services.
Economic Growth and Differentiation Mahaweli can be seen from different angles: an irrigation cum resettlement project with additional electricity production, or an hydro-power project with a social component in the downstream sections. In fact, both is equally true. From a sociological point of view, the resettlement and land-to-the-tiller component is dominant; from an economic point of view, hydro-power generation is more relevant. At any specific point in time, the two modes of water use are competitive; in the long run, and in a structural analysis, they can become complementary. Under what conditions are they complementary, or competitive? When analysing the current difficulties in Mahaweli, it has to be kept in mind that Mahaweli was originally moulded within a potentially dynamic development model. According to this model, the small-farmer sector would have played a leading role. Wide-spread surplus production would result in an increasing market integration and functional differentiation. Broad-based local demand then would generatesfavorable conditions for local craftmanship and trade which in turn may absorb the second generation of the settlers. Availability of electricity in the countryside would eventually play a catalytic role in this process thereby reducing rural-urban migration. Since income generation from agricultural production falls far behind expectations, and the second generation already searching for an existence before agricultural surplus is available to a relevant extent, the economic assumptions involved have become untenable and with it the material basis for sustainable development. Why we insist that in Mahaweli economic growth can only gather momentum after the conditions for sustainable development have been generated, is is precisely because the socio-economic parameters are no more the same due to the loss of the crucial initial years. When this fundamental fact is accepted, interventions can no longer be guided by the old model. Under the new conditions, economic growth and differentiation in agriculture are no longer functioning as a force driving society towards a higher quality of life. More probable, the small-holding sector becomes more marginalized and will remain subsistence oriented (cf. Vergani). It may well turn out that the benefits from electricity production, instead of generating non-agricultural economic growth, will have to be used for subsidizing the down-stream paddy farmers on below-subsistence-level plots and very limited alternative income opportunities. Should this be the case, the hydro-power component of Mahaweli is another - albeit extremely costly - Sri Lankan investment to curb rural-urban migration.
4) CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PRESENT VOLUME The present volume contains fourteen papers dealing with diverse aspects of the AMP. For convenience of analysis and presentation, they are classified into several groups as follows: a) AMP - its rationale and interests involved b) Ecology and Technical structure c) Economics of the AMP d) Resettlement Process e) Organizational Development and Change f) Grass-roots level Development The purpose of the present section is simply to introduce the papers in the same sequence as they are arranged in the present publication. No attempt is made to provide a systematic summary for want of space. However, in the pages that follow, attention is focused on some of the salient points discussed in the papers.
Rationale of Accelerated Mahaweli Programme Mahee Wickramaratne's paper points to the interplay of interests that shaped the initial push towards the acceleration of the process of implementation of the Mahaweli project in the late 1970''s. The aspirations of the newly elected UNP regime, readiness of the external funding agencies to assist a government with an explicit liberal economic outlook and a technocratic elite more oriented towards the engineering aspects of the project together constituted the driving force behind the AMP in its intitial stages. The alighnment and the composition of interest groups have not been static over time. The changes involved have continually influenced the process of implementation of the project at times with significant consequences. The vast array of these dynamics and their consequences get even further outlined in the comments that are annexed to the paper. Of particular interest may be the map produced by H.-P. Müller visualizing the difference between the Master Plan of UNDP and the AMP as realized till the early 1990`s.
Mahaweli Technical Structure and Its Sustainability Kapila Goonasekera's paper in the main examines the issue of sustainability of the Mahaweli system from both an environmental as well as a managerial point of view with particular attention to the effects of acceleration. The paper identifies the effects of environmental degradation in terms of soil erosion and deforestation in the upper watershed areas on the technical system, in particular the upper catchment reservoirs and the likely impact of the resulting reduced capacity on system performance, both power generation and irrigation. Attention is also drawn to the fact that the reduced time frame owing to the acceleration did provide little time for reviewing the on-going construction work in the downstrean areas thereby affecting the quality and efficacy of at least some of the lower irrigation structures. Goonasekera's paper emphasizes the importance of the implementation of a vigorous environmental conservation programme in the upper catchment areas with a view to containing soil erosion and deforestation which will have serious consequences for the sustainability of the technical structure. While highlighting the value of improved and more efficient irrigation techniques and water and soil conservation methods in the downstream settlements, this paper also points to the need for studying worse case situations through simulation modelling of the technical system with a view to devising contingency plans for such situations.
Economics of the Accelerated Mahaweli Programme The papers by Tambipille Jogaratnam and Giovanni Vergani introduced in this section draw attention to some of the macro-economic aspects of the Mahaweli project. While the first paper deals directly with the AMP, the second one examines the possible macro-economic implications of the redistribution of productive resources in the country resulting from the AMP. In his paper, Jogaratnam argues that the changed macro-economic climate in the late 1970's i.e. increasing fuel prices and rising unemployment, was largely responsible for the shift in emphasis from agriculture to power generation in the context of Mahaweli. The paper points to the most significant and tangible outcomes of the project, namely, increased hydro power generation amounting to about 50% of the total availability and the substantial reduction of rice imports due to increased production in the country owing to Mahaweli downstream development. These gains have resulted in substantial savings in foreign exchange. Even though the estimated ERR of about 10% indicates the relative economic viability of AMP, a substantial reduction in rice and oil prices could drive ERR to a much lower figure. Vergani's paper identifies a set of criteria for demarcating the basic agricultural types in the main agro-climatological zones of Sri Lanka, namely the Dry, the Intermediate and the Wet. It outlines a methodology for simulating effects which result from hypothetical changes in agro-economic parameters. The paper then examines the expected repercussioins on the agricultural sector in Sri Lanka as a whole with more land and water being made available in the Dry Zone owing to the implementation of the Mahaweli project. The production model presented and discussed reflects a positive supply response, but variability in demand has not been introduced into the model. So, while the models could be used to explain producer behaviour, the effects of changes in demand could not be ascertained. Another significant drawback of the model is that the scale of economis associated with irrigation technology cannot be investigated. The discussion in the paper also points to the potentials for regional specialization and the distributional implications thereof. The assumption of self-sufficiency in rice is, however a weakness of the model. The potential income effects on the structure of demand has not been paid any attention.
Resettlement Process The three papers included in this chapter deal with diverse aspects of the resettlement process associated with the accelerated Mahaweli Programme. While the papers by Thayer Scudder and Frank Dunnill deal with the process of resettlement in general, Ruwani Jayawardena's paper discusses aspects of healthcare planning as an integral part of settlement planning. Scudder examines the diverse constraints that have acted against the social and economic advancement of Mahaweli settlers. In this context, he recognizes the crucial significance of the initial support for the settlers and the adverse consequences of the absence of such initial interventions. The paper also highlights the negative effect of the deviation of the authorities from the stated policies, in particular those relating to settler selection. Dunnill examines the evolution of the AMP through a process of convergence of, and interaction between, donors, national political leadership and the technocrats. He examines the adverse effect of initial bias towards engineering work and the top-down approach adopted by the implementing agencies on the process of social development. The paper points out that, as a result, human development side of the AMP suffered with serious consequences. Paper by Jayawardena focuses attention on the virtual neglect of public health aspects of settlement planning in the context of the AMP and its serious consequences for settler health, well-being and productivity. She points out how the construction programme has been carried out in the downstream areas without much concern for its adverse public health consequences such as spread of malaria. As the paper points out, the weaknesses have been associated not only with preventive health. It has been even more so with the curative side, no adequate facilities for treatment being provided in the initial stages.
Organizational Development and Change Given the scale and the complexity of the AMP and the speed at which it was scheduled to be implemented, the establishment of an elaborate organizational structure to implement the project was not surprising at all.The hierarchical, bureaucratic structure that took charge of the implementation of the programme of infrastructure development and resettlement naturally adopted a top-down approach which in effect promoted settler dependence on officials. It is this state of affairs which has become a major obstacle to the development of viable, self-reliant settler organizations capable of managing local resources. It is not so much the realization of this fact that has led the authorities and donors to review the present Mahaweli management structure as the budgetary constrants emanating from the reduced central governement allocations as well as the donor insisance on cost recovery or at least sharing of costs. Douglas Merrey, in his paper, recognizes the need for organizational reform in the context of the present Mahaweli administration. However, for him, one of the basic motives of such reform should be to facilitate the establishment of viable farmer organizations. The main thrust of his argument seems to be that, while it is necessary to maintain the core of the centralized administration in order to ensure rational control and allocation of water resources, field-level officials should be so organized as to allow them to behave more like entrepreneuers responding to farmer requirements. Such a managemet environment would also be conducive to the development of self-reliant farmer organizations capable of negotiating with the officials on an equal footing. Jayantha Jayawardana's paper provides an overview of the management structures of diverese agencies which have managed irrigation development and peasant settlement schemes in Sri Lanka icluding the AMP. It identifies the reasons behind the currents efforts at the reorganization of the Mahaweli agencies. Having being a Mahaweli official himself, Jayawardena provides an account of the way Mahaweli administration evolved, in particular at the project level. Turning to farmer participation, he identifies the crucial role the organized local-level farmers could play in the operation and maintenance of the lower level irrigation structures and other resources. Jayantha Perera's paper deals with the problems and prospects of farmer organizations in the context of Mahaweli settlements. Basing largely on his experience with the farmer organization programme in system B, he draws our attentiion to the challenges that an externally initiated farmer organization programme may face. i.e., political interferance, resistance from local opinion leaders, lack of interest on the part of the farmers, bureaucratic control of local organizations, etc. The author also poses the question whether the settlers could be persuased to form farmer organizations while they are still struggling with problems of survival.
Grass-roots-level Development The four papers included in the last chapter focus attention on the grass-roots level conditions that obtain in some of the Mahaweli settlements. They provide us with some indications as to how macro-programmes get translated into local idiom in terms of both time and space. Dharshini Rajapaksha's paper based on her field research in a Mahaweli settlement specialising in OFC's (field crops other than paddy) attempts to explain the process of social differentiation from an historial-structural perspective. In doing so, she highlights the importance of pre-existing resource endowments prior to migration as a determinant of the process of differentiation. The paper also argues that the integration of local communities into large settlement schemes results in intra-family differentiation leading to an increased workload for women. Joke Schrijver Lionel Siriwardena, in his paper examines the significance of the origin of settlers in the process of their adaptation in the new environment and the performance as farmers. This is done through a comparision of three settlement units with different settler configurations in terms of origin. The paper also focuses attentioin on the evident conflict of interests between the officials and the farmers. The picture that emerges is that, instead of working together to achieve a set of common objectives, the officials and the farmers are by and large at cross purposes resulting in a constant struggle to outwit each other. And finally, S.L. Thilakasiri's paper highlights the instability of the land tenure system that is imposed on the Mahaweli settlements indicating how similar are the tenurial changes that take place across different settlement schemes. As in the other settlement situations, the emergent informal land market has made a mockery of the formal system of land tenure. Paper also identifies various factors that contributes to the social differentiation such as differential access to water and quality of soil in the allottments.
Appendix: Memorandum to MASL The participants at the Symposium on Mahaweli held at Monte Verità (Switherland) from 23 - 28 August 1992 were impressed by the achievements of the AMP, in particular, with regard to the targets for electrical power generation. However, it was also noted that, as far as downstream settler development is concerned, despite the best efforts that have been made, there is still much to be desired. Many settlers seem to have had a bad start due to various circumstances and as a result, they have not been able to break away from poverty. In view of this state of affairs, it was felt that it is time for reviewing the current settler development programmes and take remedial measures to rectify the drawbacks as much as possible. 1. While recognizing the fact that the realization of the potentials of the AMP rests as much on the success of its human development programme as on the successful completion of the physical planning components, it was agreed that there was an urgent need to strengthen the institutional arrangements relating to the former at the executive level within the Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka. It was felt that a senior advisor with a strong human development orientation should be placed next to the Director-General so that the latter could be expeditioulsy and competently informed of the economic and social needs of the Mahaweli settlers. 2. In order to make wide-ranging expert advise on human development issues available to both the advisor-in-charge and the MASL administration, the need to appoint a panel of Sri Lankan experts was also recognized. The panel of experts on human development may help the administration to monitor and guide the processes of social and economic development in the settlement areas. 3. In view of the urgent need for strenthening the settler development programme, it was felt that funding agencies and certain non-governmental agencies should continue to play a significant part in the current phase of Mahaweli development. This is particularly so because the realization of the major project objectives, in particular those relating to socio-economic development, will depend as much on the continued support as on the initial investments. 4. It seems to us that the aid community can, with the assent of the Government of Sri Lanka, make a significant contribution by providing funds to help settlers to form associations and smallfarmers cooperatives for purposes chosen by themselves. We have in mind a trust on the lines of the one that was started by the Europea Community in Zone 2 of System C, working with settlers at the grass-roots and especially (as is being done by the Duch-financed team in System C) with women who want to obtain credit for a variety of practical purposes. We think,that the Trust should have settlers on its Board, should be based downstream and should go out of its way to give settlers children practical experience of work in appropriate fields. It would also have distinguished Sri Lankans and one or two experienced and sympathetic foreigners on its Board, which would meet and conduct its business in the field - in close touch with the settlers. Such a Trust, we believe, could play a supportive and complementary role to EIED and various donor-assisted programmes in generating employment opportunities. 5. Poverty and ill-health among settler families tend to reduce their productivity. The multiflier effects of such a situation can be detrimental to the achievement of overall development objectives. This necessitates the early identification of particularly vulnerable groups such as marginalized women, the dispossessed, children and the unemployed so that specific programmes of health and development support can be targetted towards them. 6. In view of the accpted state policy of participatory management of irrigation resources, a concerted effort should be made to identify and support local initiatives even in the field of irrigation management. Moereover, local initiatives in other areas, such as housing, primary healthcare, nutrition and credit should also be encouraged and promoted. Strengthening of settler associations will no doubt promote settler committment and facilitate sharing of costs between the state and the local communities. It was also felt that the best approach to local institution building is to promote grass-roots level self-help initiatives and facilitate horizontal exchange of information using simple communication media such as news letters and face to face interaction. 7. Many settler communities are characterized by a high degree of social disorganization as exemplified by intra-community conflicts, abuse of alcohol, high rate of suicide, and widespread violation of rules, regulations and norms. While efforts at community organization may help increase social cohesion, specific programmes aimed at reducing the above social problems will have to be designed and implemented. 8. In recognition of the fact that there is already a considerable body of research information on diverse aspects of Mahaweli and that there is no systematic effort to make use of this information for planning and implementation purposes, it was felt that it would be useful to evolve an internal process whereby the available research material can be perused and applied for planning and implementation purposes.
|
